Were there important points of agreement on coverage approaches or news philosophy
that would improve the newspaper's content and its credibility? What were they?
Were there points on which roundtable participants agreed to disagree?
Where were they?
Will the newspaper consider changes in its coverage of the roundtable issue,
or in its news philosophy, as a result of the discussions? What changes?
How has the newspaper informed its readers of the roundtable, what happened
there and what may occur because of the discussion?
Please send tearsheets of roundtable coverage.