INFORMATION ABOUT THE ROUNDTABLE ITSELF:
Who took part in the roundtable? Please provide a list of participants,
who they are and how to reach them.
Were there important points of agreement on coverage approaches or news philosophy
that would improve the newspaper's content and its credibility? What were they?
Were there points on which roundtable participants agreed to disagree?
Where were they?
Will the newspaper consider changes in its coverage of the roundtable issue,
or in its news philosophy, as a result of the discussions? What changes? (Professors should consult
with their key editor contact to answer this and other questions referring to the newspaper's actions.)
How has the newspaper informed its readers of the roundtable, what happened
there and what may occur because of the discussion?
Please send tearsheets of roundtable coverage.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE CLASS AND THE STUDENTS:
What did your students learn from putting on a roundtable?
What worked well in having the students organize and facilitate the roundtable?
From the professor's viewpoint?
From the newspaper's viewpoint?
What would you do differently if you had another class work on a roundtable?
INFORMATION ABOUT THE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NEWSPAPER:
What was important for the university to offer to gain the newspaper's cooperation?
What was important for the newspaper to provide to help the university and the professor?
Do you have any other advice for professors who would like to do a roundtable? If so, please include it here.